· 9/21/1988
Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Shipman
Citations
- 756 S.W.2d 930
- 25 Ark. App. 247
- 1988 Ark. App. LEXIS 422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although it was “readily apparent” that Department ofHuman Services employees intended to appeal from their contempt conviction, that matter was not properly before the appellate court where the notice of appeal made no reference to the contempt order
- notice of appeal must be judged by what it recites and not what it intends to recite; it must state the order appealed from with specificity, and orders not mentioned in it are not properly before the appellate court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cracraft, Corbin, Jennings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.