Skip to main content
· 9/21/1988

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Shipman

Citations

  • 756 S.W.2d 930
  • 25 Ark. App. 247
  • 1988 Ark. App. LEXIS 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although it was “readily apparent” that Department ofHuman Services employees intended to appeal from their contempt conviction, that matter was not properly before the appellate court where the notice of appeal made no reference to the contempt order
  • notice of appeal must be judged by what it recites and not what it intends to recite; it must state the order appealed from with specificity, and orders not mentioned in it are not properly before the appellate court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cracraft, Corbin, Jennings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.