Skip to main content
· 4/17/2006

Arkadiy L. Kholyavskiy v. Deborah Achim, Alberto R. Gonzales, and Michael Chertoff

Citations

  • 443 F.3d 946
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9567
  • 2006 WL 988043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that petitioner’s decision to name the Chicago ICE Field Office Director and not the state prison warden as respondent to his habeas petition was a jurisdictional defect
  • concluding that a determination that a District Director is an immediate custodian “‘conflate[s] the person responsible for authorizing custody with the person responsible for maintaining custody’” (quoting al-Marri v. Rumsfeld, 360 F.3d 707, 711 (7th Cir. 2004)
  • explaining that circuits are divided on the question of whether a detained alien challenging his impending removal must name the warden of his detention facility in a habeas petition, or may name an immigration official instead
  • applying immediate custodian rule and finding that warden of the facility in which alien is detained is the only proper respondent
  • “Typically, for an inmate of a jail or prison, his immediate custodian is the warden.”
  • “Typically, for an inmate of a jail or prison, his immediate custodian is the warden.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.