· 4/17/2006
Arkadiy L. Kholyavskiy v. Deborah Achim, Alberto R. Gonzales, and Michael Chertoff
Citations
- 443 F.3d 946
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9567
- 2006 WL 988043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that petitioner’s decision to name the Chicago ICE Field Office Director and not the state prison warden as respondent to his habeas petition was a jurisdictional defect
- concluding that a determination that a District Director is an immediate custodian “‘conflate[s] the person responsible for authorizing custody with the person responsible for maintaining custody’” (quoting al-Marri v. Rumsfeld, 360 F.3d 707, 711 (7th Cir. 2004)
- explaining that circuits are divided on the question of whether a detained alien challenging his impending removal must name the warden of his detention facility in a habeas petition, or may name an immigration official instead
- applying immediate custodian rule and finding that warden of the facility in which alien is detained is the only proper respondent
- “Typically, for an inmate of a jail or prison, his immediate custodian is the warden.”
- “Typically, for an inmate of a jail or prison, his immediate custodian is the warden.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.