Ark. State Highway Comm. v. McHaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing termination of rights given no particularized evidence as to adverse effects of foster care or impermanency on the children in question
• reversing termination of rights given no particularized evidence as to adverse effects of foster care or impermanency on the children in question
• giving concrete examples of evidence where the continued deprivation is likely to cause the child serious harm: (1) a caseworker testifying “as to any adverse effect on the children by their remaining in foster care as opposed to their being permanently adopted,” (2
• where evidence showed only mother’s inability to parent, termination of parental rights was not authorized
• no expert testimony that permanency and a stable environment were important to children’s well-being
• no expert testimony that permanency and a stable environment were important to children’s well-being

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).