Arjona, Graciela Casas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Rehabilitation Act “broadly prohibits federal agencies from discriminating on the basis of disability and provides judicially enforceable rights”
• finding that an agency error which was quickly corrected did not establish pretext because there was “no evidence to establish that this temporary error was anything but a genuine oversight.”
• holding McDonnell Douglas applies to discrimination claims under the Rehabilitation Act
• applying the McDonnell Douglas framework in the context of a Rehabilitation Act claim
• “[W]e have repeatedly explained that arguments briefed in the most cursory fashion are waived.”
• “[W]e have repeatedly explained that arguments briefed in the most cursory fashion are waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).