Arizona's Towing Professionals, Inc. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contracting agency had no authority to hear protest of RFP terms when RFP stated that objections to defects had to be made prior to bid opening, and disappointed bidder had not filed timely, pre-bid, protest
• finding that the government did not 2 act in good faith when it invoked a termination for convenience clause to moot an appeal 3 of another contracting party
• “Where a procedural requirement protects important rights or interests, a[n] . . . exception to that requirement should be construed narrowly or the exception may swallow the rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).