Arizona Water Company v. City of Yuma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a certificate of convenience and necessity has value only while the holder of the certificate is an ongoing concern
• “As a general rule, remote and speculative damages are disregarded in condemnation cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).