Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court must perform an independent de novo review of the record to ensure that the plaintiff has satisfied his burden of proving actual malice by clear and convincing evidence, citing cases and authorities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Winston Bryant McConney
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-02-10· cited 1,819×
• Marcone v. Penthouse Internatinal, Ltd.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-12-14· cited 13×
• Eleuterio Benitez-Mendez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-06-10· cited 9×
• Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Sentinel Pub. Co., Inc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-07-21· cited 9×
• Eleuterio Benitez-Mendez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-11-28· cited 6×
• Held v. Pokorny
  S.D. New York· 1984-04-06· cited 6×
• English v. Sava
  S.D. New York· 1983-09-22· cited 3×

Other cases named Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-23