Arizona Department of Revenue v. Great Western Publishing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that Leathers broadly prohibited any tax discriminating among publications on basis of content, concluding instead that “[gjenuine ‘content-based’ discrimination” must be based on “particular ideas or viewpoints”
• publication reviewed for certain key factors, such as news and editorials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).