Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Stanford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that juvenile court cannot initiate a guardianship “in the absence of a statutorily compliant motion by a party to the proceedings”
• holding that juvenile court cannot initiate a guardianship “in the absence of a statutorily compliant motion by a party to the proceedings”
• concluding that the ICPC applies “to placement with parents and relatives” (quotation simplified)
• concluding that the ICPC applies “to placement with parents and relatives” (quotation simplified)
• finding that a court erred in proceeding with guardianship proceedings in the absence of a motion complying with A.R.S. § 8-872
• finding that juvenile court could not initiate guardianship “in the absence of a statutorily compliant motion by a party to the proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).