Skip to main content
· 3/12/1951

Arizona Corp. Commission v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.

Citations

  • 228 P.2d 749
  • 71 Ariz. 404
  • 1951 Ariz. LEXIS 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting language \unnecessary to sustain the judgment of the court\ may be considered \dictum\
  • “dictum” is “language . . . unnecessary to sustain the judgment of the court”
  • “dictum” is “language ... unnecessary to sustain the judgment of the court”
  • language unnecessary to sustain the judgment is dictum
  • language unnecessary to sustain judgment is dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prade, Udall, Stanford, Phelps, De Concini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.