Arizaga v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the hardship factor weighed in favor of produc�on because the bank had not produce evidence it had been “meaningfully sanc�oned” for complying with two previous U.S. court orders to produce documents in contraven�on of China’s bank secrecy laws
• granting default judgment with respect to defendants Islamic Republic of Iran, Syrian Arab Republic, and other Iranian and Syrian defendants
• finding the MOJ's past practices validate concerns that Hague Convention requests are not viable alternative to subpoena
• finding that this factor weighed against the plaintiff
• \BOC argued that the Hague Convention would provide a perfectly adequate means of securing the information requested without forcing the Bank to violate Chinese law\ (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• \[T]he Chinese interest in building confidence in its banking industry does not encompass an interest in protecting the confidentiality of those who participate in the funding of international terrorism.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).