Arista v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Arista’s competency was presumed, thereby implying that no judgment of incompetency existed prior to hearing
• holding Arista’s competency was presumed, thereby implying that no judgment of incompetency existed prior to hearing
• holding Arista’s competency was presumed, thereby implying that no judgment of incompetency existed prior to hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).