Arismendez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant pled nolo contendere but proceeding on punishment was erroneously bifurcated from guilt
• defendant pled nolo conten-dere but proceeding on punishment was erroneously bifurcated from guilt
• guilty or nolo contendere plea proceedings should not be bifurcated
• “a guilty or nolo contendere plea proceeding should not be bifurcated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carroll v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-16· cited 116×
• Wilkerson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 115×
• Carroll v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-03-07· cited 82×
• Duhart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-15· cited 68×
• in Re the State of Texas Ex. Rel. Stephen B. Tyler
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-10-30
• Jonathan Ray Gray v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-08-26