Arippa v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that customers would buy from an electric utility as the provider of last resort if market rates rose above the capped rates
• noting that customers would buy 11 from an electric utility as the provider of last resort if market rates rose above the capped rates
• noting that deference is due to an agency's interpretation of a statute rendered while acting in an expert capacity during the course of an adjudication
• noting that deference is due to an agency’s interpretation of a statute rendered while acting in an expert capacity during the course of an adjudication
• noting that, historically, electric utilities in Pennsylvania were vertically integrated
• stating the rationale behind the Electric Competition Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).