Arild v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court has conducted a statutory, not a policy, analysis and therefore, will not address the policy arguments asserted by the parties.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Because ERISA is a federal law and fiduciary status and defalcation under the Bankruptcy Code are also determinations made under federal! law, this Court finds no compelling reason to hold that an ERISA fiduciary is not a per se fiduciary for § 523(a)(4) purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).