Ariel Land Owners, Inc. v. Lori Dring Nancy Asaro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “failure to remove within the one-year time limit established by § 1446(b) is not a jurisdictional defect”
• holding that a district court’s dismissal of claims preceding its remand was a “final decision” under § 1291
• recognizing that remand under § 1447(c) based on a procedural defect “may only be effected by a timely motion”
• holding that timeliness is not a colorably jurisdictional basis for remand
• removal jurisdiction was proper notwithstanding one-year bar because case “could have initially been filed in federal court”
• removal jurisdiction was proper notwithstanding one-year bar because case “could have initially been filed in federal court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).