Skip to main content
· 1/8/1991

Arias v. Solis

Citations

  • 754 F. Supp. 290
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158
  • 1991 WL 1681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding boxer’s services were “unique and extraordinary” where one organization ranked boxer tenth in his division, another seventh
  • “Even though a contract may expressly state that the employee’s services are unique or extraordinary, as in this case, the Court is not bound by the statement, and it does not preclude the Court from making a finding to the contrary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.