Ariadne Financial Services Pty. Ltd. And Memvale Pty. Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the continuing claims doctrine did not apply in a case involving the breach of a twenty-year contract
• holding that claimaint’s breach of contract claim accrued when claimant should have known that it had been damaged by the government's breach
• holding that, since “[tjhere was a single repudiation by which the government made clear its intent to reject the term of the contracts. Each subsequent denial ... does not give rise to a separate cause of action.”
• stating that the plaintiff’s claim “accrued when [the plaintiff] should have known that it had been damaged by the government’s breach”
• stating that the government made clear its intent to reject the terms of the contracts
• contending that the Executive Branch’s dispositive error in its motion is that the Tribe’s recognized title to the Uncompahgre Reservation stems from a congressional act, and that only Congress may divest an Indian tribe of its recognized title to Indian land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).