Third Circuit· 11/27/2018
Ari Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc
Citations
- 909 F.3d 604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that in response to a party’s failure to comply with M.D. Pa. L.R. 56.1 “the District Court's decision to employ any given sanction—out of the many possible sanctions available to it—is fully within the discretion of that Court”
- noting that American Pipe “included no express restrictions in the broad language it used to describe the claims to which tolling would apply”
- explaining that “a district court’s interpretation and application of its own local rules should generally be reviewed for abuse of discretion”
- noting that American Pipe “included no express restrictions in the broad language it used to describe the claims to which tolling would apply”
- providing that “China Agritech precludes the application of American Pipe tolling to such successive class claims,” and therefore “plaintiffs’ class claims are not subject to tolling”
- finding that a court confronted with a failure to comply with LR 56.1 “is in the best position to determine . . . the appropriate sanction for such noncompliance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, McKee, Restrepo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fierro v. Landry's Rest. Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-02-15· cited 55×
- Bahaa Aly v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals InterThird Circuit· 2021-06-16· cited 9×
- Jay Folse v. Tiffany HoffmanFourth Circuit· 2024-11-20· cited 6×
- Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Lg Electronics Inc.Federal Circuit· 2022-09-07· cited 1×
- Fierro v. Landry's Restaurant, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2019-02-15
- Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (No. Ii)- Mdl No. 2925District of Columbia· 2023-06-21
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
- Nicini v. MorraThird Circuit· 2000-05-19· cited 680×
- Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 482×
- Smith v. Bayer Corp.Supreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 410×
- Chardon v. Fumero SotoSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 275×
- China Agritech, Inc. v. ReshSupreme Court· 2018-06-11· cited 228×
- California Public Employees' Retirement System v. ANZ Securities, Inc.Supreme Court· 2017-06-26· cited 219×
- John Daubert v. NRA Group LLCThird Circuit· 2017-07-03· cited 192×
- Jackie McDowell v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (Pha) John White Barry Miller Jackie McDowell and the Certified Class Whom She RepresentsThird Circuit· 2005-09-13· cited 70×
- Yang v. OdomThird Circuit· 2004-12-15· cited 46×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. MillsThird Circuit· 2011-02-09· cited 37×
Other cases named Ari Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.