Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “conclusory testimony” “unsupported by documentary or other concrete evidence” was “not enough to create a genuine issue of fact in light of . . . evidence to the contrary”
• affirming summary judgment for the defendant because plaintiffs failed to present a triable issue of fact on the element of causation
• affirming grant of summary judgment where sworn deposition testimony, although specific, was “unsupported by documentary or other concrete evidence” and was “simply not enough to create a genuine issue of fact in light of the evidence to the contrary”
• affirming grant of summary judgment where sworn deposition testimony, although specific, was “unsupported by documentary or other concrete evidence” and was “simply not enough to create a genuine issue of fact in light of the evidence to the contrary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).