Arguelles v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that pursuant to Rule 83, “a district court may adopt and amend local rules so long as they are consistent with, but not duplicative of, the Federal Rules”
• describing a similar “point-counterpoint framework” for summary judgment in the Central District of Illinois as a “prototypical substantive local rule”
• stating “[w]hile this court has not previously addressed an interference claim made pursuant to the ADA. . . guidance can be found in our application of the anti- interference provision of the Fair Housing Act”
• summary judgment proper on interference claim under sister statute to the ADA where the plaintiff failed to establish that she engaged in statutorily protected activity
• “Because the ADA anti-interference clause is identical to the anti-interference clause found in the FHA... we use the FHA framework to establish the legal standard for an ADA interference claim.”
• Central District of Illinois has discretion to set and enforce local rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).