Argonaut Insurance v. Ketchen, Fireman's Fund Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that former ORS 29.350 (1965) required that a garnishment proceeding be “tried with a jury unless the parties waive a jury trial”
• holding that the phrase “any employee” in an exclusion clause was intended to “enlarge the scope of the phrase” and to “preclude [ ] limiting the application of the phrase to a particular kind of employee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).