Skip to main content
· 3/18/1996

Argencourt v. United States

Citations

  • 78 F.3d 14
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4619
  • 1996 WL 106532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant must overcome the presumption that the challenged action “might be considered sound trial strategy”
  • a petitioner seeking to vacate his sentence based on the ineffective assistance of counsel bears a very heavy burden
  • where no single trial error in isolation is sufficiently prejudicial 18 to warrant habeas relief, “the cumulative effect of multiple errors may still prejudice a 19 defendant”
  • “In determining whether trial counsel’s performance fell below the relevant objective benchmark, ‘judicial scrutiny of counsel’s performance must be highly deferential,’ and ‘every effort [should] be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight.’ ”
  • guoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Campbell, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.