· 3/18/1996
Argencourt v. United States
Citations
- 78 F.3d 14
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4619
- 1996 WL 106532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding defendant must overcome the presumption that the challenged action “might be considered sound trial strategy”
- a petitioner seeking to vacate his sentence based on the ineffective assistance of counsel bears a very heavy burden
- where no single trial error in isolation is sufficiently prejudicial 18 to warrant habeas relief, “the cumulative effect of multiple errors may still prejudice a 19 defendant”
- “In determining whether trial counsel’s performance fell below the relevant objective benchmark, ‘judicial scrutiny of counsel’s performance must be highly deferential,’ and ‘every effort [should] be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight.’ ”
- guoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Campbell, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.