Arevalos-Alfaro v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing pro se appeal because the brief did “not refer to facts in the record or contain an argument consisting of more than a generalized assertion of error”
• dismissing pro se appeal because the brief did “not refer to facts in the record or contain an argument consisting of more than a generalized assertion of error”
• dismissing pro se appeal because the brief did “not refer to facts in the record or contain an argument consisting of more than a generalized assertion of error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).