Arevalo v. Burg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]laintiff's proposed retaliation claim is insufficient because it contains no factual allegations that ‘sufficiently suggest that [defendant]'s counterclaims could have a direct, adverse impact on [plaintiff]'s present employment or future employment prospects.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).