Arenburg v. Farmholme, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in an action on the case that a master-servant relationship must exist and that loss of services is the gist of the seduction cause of action
• holding in an action on the case that a master-servant relationship must exist and that loss of services is the gist of the seduction cause of action
• “Previous decisions of this court should not be disturbed ... unless it is plainly seen that glaring injustice has been done or some egregious blunder committed.”
• \Previous decisions of this court should not be disturbed ... unless it is plainly seen that glaring injustice has been done or some egregious blunder committed.\
• \Previous decisions of this court should not be disturbed ... unless it is plainly seen that glaring injustice has been done or some egregious blunder committed.\
• “Previous decisions of this court should not be disturbed ... unless it is plainly seen that glaring injustice has been done or some egregious blunder committed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).