Aren Design, Inc. v. Becerra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The use of the word 'shall' in the statute is presumed to indicate a mandatory requirement.\
• “The use of the word ‘shall’ in the statute is presumed to indicate a mandatory requirement.”
• “The use of the word ‘shall’ in the statute is presumed to indicate a mandatory requirement.” (citing Colo. State Bd. of Med. Exam’rs v. Saddoris, 825 P.2d 39, 43 (Colo. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blue Mesa Forest v. Lopez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-10-24· cited 13×
• Lymburn v. Symbios Logic
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1997-09-18· cited 9×
• ion Maternity v. Burren
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2020-05-18· cited 9×
• Personnel Department, Inc. v. Professional Staff Leasing Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-10-27· cited 9×
• Brownson-Rausin v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-10-20· cited 4×
• Crowell v. Industrial Claim Appeals office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-02-16· cited 3×
• Filippi v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-10-10· cited 2×
• v. Governor's Office of Information Technology
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-05-21· cited 1×
• Arguello v. Fe Ana Balsick & Colo. Bluesky Enters., Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-02-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority v. Nofio
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-12-19· cited 89×
• Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. Saddoris
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1992-03-10· cited 53×
• Snyder Oil Co. v. Embree
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-11-15· cited 46×
• Turner v. City and County of Denver
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-12-16· cited 1×