Skip to main content
· 2/20/2018

Area 51 Productions v. City of Alameda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • endorsing a but-for causation standard for retaliation claims under the False Claims Act
  • “A party can be held to concessions and admissions its counsel made at oral argument.”
  • to sufficiently allege a causal connection between protected activity under the False Claims Act and an adverse action, a plaintiff must “show that the harm he suffered would not have occurred in the absence of, that is, but for his protected conduct”
  • to sufficiently allege a causal connection between protected activity under the False Claims Act and an adverse action, a plaintiff must “show that the harm he suffered would not have occurred in the absence of, that is, but for his protected conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.