· 2/20/2018
Area 51 Productions v. City of Alameda
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- endorsing a but-for causation standard for retaliation claims under the False Claims Act
- “A party can be held to concessions and admissions its counsel made at oral argument.”
- to sufficiently allege a causal connection between protected activity under the False Claims Act and an adverse action, a plaintiff must “show that the harm he suffered would not have occurred in the absence of, that is, but for his protected conduct”
- to sufficiently allege a causal connection between protected activity under the False Claims Act and an adverse action, a plaintiff must “show that the harm he suffered would not have occurred in the absence of, that is, but for his protected conduct”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.