Ardolino v. City of Pittsburgh Civil Service Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that an issue not raised in an opening brief is not properly raised for the first time in a supplemental brief
• “Jones clarified that a discretionary sentencing system . . . suffices to ensure individualized consideration of a defendant’s youth.”
• issue raised for the first time in a supplemental brief to the en banc court after remand from the Supreme Court is forfeited
• “permanent incorrigibility is not an eligibility criterion for juvenile LWOP” under Jones

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).