Ardoin v. Travelers Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an acceptance occurred where counsel sent an email confirming that the proposed settlement agreement was agreed to
• stating that a settlement agreement is a valid, binding contract supported by consideration where one party surrenders their ability to bring a claim against a second party in exchange for a promise
• holding a bank does not have a duty to take action against a client's bank account when the bank suspects fraud, in order to protect a third-party bank from future similar fraudulent conduct
• holding a bank does not have a duty to take action against a client’s bank account when the bank suspects fraud, in order to protect a third-party bank from future similar fraudulent conduct
• holding a bank does not have a duty to take action against a client's bank account when the bank suspects fraud, in order to protect a third-party bank from future similar fraudulent conduct
• enforcing terms of draft settlement agreement where parties reached “meeting of the minds” regarding essential terms of the agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).