Ardoin v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating only evidence contrary to a no-evidence motion can be considered
• “The Wyard palletizer had been in use for ten years, and Ardoin produced no evidence that the company’s existing safety measures had 32 previously failed to protect employees against this particular risk.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).