Ardente v. Standard Fire Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting application of the rule against superfluities where “redundancies abound” (quoting TMW Enters., Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 619 F.3d 574, 577 (6th Cir. 2010))
• rejecting application of the rule against superfluities where \redundancies abound\ (quoting TMW Enters., Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co. , 619 F.3d 574 , 577-78 (6th Cir. 2010) )
• \[The] label ['redundancy'] surely is not a fatal one when it comes to insurance contracts ... where redundancies abound.\
• “[The] label [‘redundancy’] surely is not a fatal one when it comes to insurance contracts . . . where redundancies abound.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).