Skip to main content
· 6/5/2007

Ard Ex Rel. Estate of Ard v. Metro-North Railroad

Citations

  • 492 F. Supp. 2d 95
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was proper to prevent the defendant from taking a position at trial that contradicted the position taken in its discovery responses
  • implicitly holding in an order denying a motion for new trial that violating internal railroad rules is not negligence per se

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruling Re: Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for a New Trial

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.