· 6/5/2007
Ard Ex Rel. Estate of Ard v. Metro-North Railroad
Citations
- 492 F. Supp. 2d 95
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was proper to prevent the defendant from taking a position at trial that contradicted the position taken in its discovery responses
- implicitly holding in an order denying a motion for new trial that violating internal railroad rules is not negligence per se
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruling Re: Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for a New Trial
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.