Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding summary judgment appropriate where undisputed facts compel conclusion that one party owed no duty to other
• holding summary judgment appropriate where undisputed facts compel conclusion that one party owed no duty to other
• noting that in Turnbull v. LaRose, 702 P.2d 1331, 1334 (Alaska 1985
• \Summary judgment is proper where the only reasonable inference from the undisputed facts is that one party owed another no duty whatsoever—or owed a duty clearly and vastly narrower in scope than the one that the other party asserts in opposing summary judgment.\
• \Summary judgment is proper where the only reasonable inference from the undisputed facts is that one party owed another no duty whatsoever-or owed a duty clearly and vastly narrower in scope than the one that the other party asserts in opposing summary judgment.\
• questions of fact reserved for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).