Arcor, Inc. v. Textron, Inc. And Bridgeport MacHines Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Improper statements during closing arguments warrant reversal only if they 'influenced the jury in such a way that substantial prejudice resulted to' the opposing party.\ (quoting Fenolio v. Smith, 802 F.2d 256, 258 (7th Cir. 1986))
• under parallel Illinois law “buyer is deemed to have met the notice requirement when the seller has actual knowledge of the product's failure based on the seller's own observations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).