Skip to main content
· 8/22/1983

Architectural Woodcraft Co. v. Read

Citations

  • 464 A.2d 210
  • 1983 Me. LEXIS 793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing that entering into a single contract together with the use of interstate communications does not establish a basis for asserting jurisdiction
  • No jurisdiction where non-resident Defendant ordered product from resident Plaintiff which was shipped to him in California
  • The fact that the defendant, a California resident, ordered a staircase from the plaintiff, a Maine business, and communicated via interstate communication does not establish a basis for asserting jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant
  • only contacts between nonresident defendant and Maine arose from the purchase of a staircase via telephone and mail; there was no allegation that the defendant ever set foot or conducted any other business in Maine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKusick, Godfrey, Nichols, Roberts, Wathen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.