Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/7/1913
Archer v. Whitten
Citations
- 120 Minn. 433
- 139 N.W. 815
- 1913 Minn. LEXIS 685
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- newlydiscovered evidence consisting of letter claimed to be admission of plaintiff and of which defendant had no recollection and which he had discovered accidentally was grounds for new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Below, Bunn, Holt, Took, Tried
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.