Archer v. State Road Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the experience prong is met because “historically, courts have openly provided the press and general public with access to civil complaints”
• holding the district court erred in granting CNS’s motion for preliminary injunction and imposing a bright-line, five-business-hour rule for when complaints needed to be made public
• discussing state courts’ “valid” interest in ensuring “the orderly administration of justice” when courts reviewed complaints for confidential information
• explaining a district court’s factual findings in resolving a motion for a preliminary injunction are reviewed for clear error
• “Younger applies to the following three categories of state cases: (1) state criminal prosecutions, (2) civil enforcement proceedings, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).