· 11/5/1992
Archer v. State Farm Insurance
Citations
- 615 A.2d 779
- 419 Pa. Super. 558
- 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When an insured nullifies an insurer’s ability to enforce its subrogation rights ... the injured party is no longer entitled to recover from the insurer.”
- where the parties have reduced their obligations to writing, the interpretation of the writing controls this Court’s review
- Under the terms of a “no action clause,” “[t]he insured was obligated to notify [the insurer] before settlement with the tort-feasor.”
- insured’s settlement with tort-feasors precludes recovery for underin-sured motorist benefits from insurer
- insurer’s subrogation rights extinguished when insured settled with tortfeasor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Montemuro, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.