Skip to main content
· 9/4/2007

Archer v. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

Citations

  • 633 F. Supp. 2d 259
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The terms “were apparent on the face of the loan documents and with due diligence each could have easily determined that they had not been offered the ‘best’ rate”; as a result, “[n]either the discovery rule nor the doctrine of fraudulent concealment tolled the statute of limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.