Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that the phrase “whether caused by a peril insured against or otherwise” was added to the Delay Clause to overcome the suggestion in Lanasa Fruit that losses caused by delay are covered if the delay was caused by an insured peril
• commenting that the phrase \whether caused by a peril insured against or otherwise\ was added to the Delay Clause to overcome the suggestion in Lanasa Fruit that losses caused by delay are covered if the delay was caused by an insured peril
• “[T]he Delay Clause in the Policy at issue clearly states that losses arising from delay are excluded whether caused by a peril insured against or otherwise . . . . To hold otherwise would give the Delay Clause no meaning and would render it a nullity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).