Skip to main content
· 9/12/2019

Archer Bernard Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that certifications with law are relevant for materiality when the conditions bear a relationship to the rel- evant payment
  • reasoning that certifications with law are relevant for materiality when the conditions bear a relationship to the rel- evant payment
  • “We have framed the public disclosure inquiry as a three-part test: (1) have the allegations made by the plaintiff been publicly disclosed; (2) if so, is the disclosed information the basis of the plaintiff’s suit; (3
  • considering the defendant’s contacts with Georgia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.