Arch Se Communications v. Abraham Comm.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that decision denying motion to compel arbitration— which was affirmed on appeal—did not preclude further litigation concerning validity of underlying agreement between the parties
• holding that decision denying motion to compel arbitration— which was affirmed on appeal — did not preclude further litigation concerning validity of underlying agreement between the parties
• holding that decision on motion to compel arbitration did not preclude further litigation
• holding that prior per curiam affirmance of the trial court’s decision denying motion to compel arbitration, was not “law of the case” concerning whether buyer and seller entered into valid oral agreement settling disposition of escrowed money
• holding that prior per curiam affirmance of the trial court's decision denying motion to compel arbitration, was not \law of the case\ concerning whether buyer and seller entered into valid oral agreement settling disposition of escrowed money
• finding that law of the case did not apply where prior decision involved only resolution of issues actually litigated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).