Arch-Bilt Container Corp. v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that law firm was liable for restitution of contingency, fee but not of other, non-contingent fees following vacatur of judgment
• holding that law firm was liable for restitution of contingency fee but not of other, non-contingent fees following vacatur of judgment
• holding that law firm was liable for restitution of contingency fee but not of other, non-contingent fees following vacatur of judgment
• where investors won fraud suit at trial but lost on appeal, investors’ lawyers were required to make restitution of that portion of funds representing a contingent fee retained in connection with the matter but not for disbursements retained or made to third parties for client debts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).