Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, except in extraordinary circumstances, “when a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages in the same case” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “Whether amendments made during reissue en- large the scope of the claim . . . is a matter of claim con- struction, which we review de novo, while giving deference to subsidiary factual determinations.”
• “Whether amendments made during reissue en- large the scope of the claim . . . is a matter of claim con- struction, which we review de novo, while giving deference to subsidiary factual determinations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).