Arce v. Aramark Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failed to present evidence regarding the employment demographics in the relevant geographic areas, from which a factfinder rationally might assess the appropriate § 1630.2(j)(3) criteria
• granting employer’s motion for summary judgment when plaintiff failed to prove that he was a qualified individual with a disability because he did not present admissible evidence that his vitiligo substantially limited a major life activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).