Arcata Graphics Co. v. New York State Division of Human Rights

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parents’ abandonment of lawful permanent resident status was imputed to their minor child “who was subject to their custody and control”
• holding that parents’ abandonment of lawful permanent resident status was imputed to their minor child “who was subject to their custody and control”
• holding that parents’ abandonment of lawful permanent resident status was imputed to their minor child “who was subject to their cus- tody and control”
• holding that parents’ abandonment of lawful permanent resident status was imputed to their minor child “who was subject to their cus- tody and control”
• holding that parents’ abandonment of lawful permanent resident status was imputed to their minor child “who was subject to their cus- tody and control”
• holding that “[t]he abandonment of [the parents of petitioner’s] permanent resident status is imputed to [petitioner], who was subject to their custody and control” when they abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).