Skip to main content
· 8/1/1991

Arcade Water District, a Public Agency of the State of California v. United States

Citations

  • 940 F.2d 1265
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 9398
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6093
  • 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20132
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17092
  • 1991 WL 143820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding water contamination could ultimately abate and prove to have been temporary, thus related claim was sufficient to survive dismissal on limitations grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tang, Fletcher, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.