· 3/8/2010
Arbuckle v. City of Chattanooga
Citations
- 696 F. Supp. 2d 907
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20824
- 2010 WL 925846
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing state constitutional claims that are “identical in intent and purpose with the Fourth Amendment” because “there is no private right of action for damages based on alleged violations of the Tennessee Constitution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: R. Allan Edgar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.