Arbogast v. Kansas Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \receipt of funds under the Rehabilitation Act is a valid waiver of [Eleventh Amendment] immunity\ (emphasis omitted)
• explaining that the Sharer court held that the “receipt of federal funds by Judicial 8 Department did not waive Eleventh Amendment immunity for Rehabilitation Act claims against 9 agency”
• noting that a municipality’s capacity to be sued is governed by state law
• “Congress 7 enacted the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to combat discrimination targeted toward individuals with physical and mental disabilities.”
• “Congress enacted the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to combat discrimination targeted toward individuals with physical and mental disabilities.”
• “Congress enacted the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to combat discrimination targeted toward individuals with physical and mental disabilities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).